Veriso · The assurance system
Veriso takes the safety studies and plans you already have and turns them into clear actions for named people, then checks in the field that they are actually happening, with proof attached.
Why we exist
The standards exist, the methods work, and most organisations already have good people. What's been missing is a system that keeps it all current and provable. That system is Veriso.
Studies age; the register does not. It always reflects your site as it is today, and it tells you the moment a document underneath falls out of date.
Instead of trusting declarations passed up the line, you get proof from the field: where, when, and who checked. Boards read evidence, not summaries of summaries.
Every project is measured the same way, so you can compare sites at a glance, put attention where it matters most, and tell the difference between a site that is safe and one that is simply quiet.
How it works
Your existing studies and plans become a list of clear, checkable actions, each one linked back to the exact document it came from.
Each action goes to a named person who owns it. The system suggests; the person decides, and the decision is recorded.
Checks come back from the field with a place, a time and a name. What you see is not what people plan to do, but what is actually protecting your people today.
What Veriso is
Veriso is two products that share one standard of proof and one record. Each works on its own, and they are stronger together.
The controls you can prove, across the whole programme.
Six products that turn the documents you already have into clear actions for named people, and bring back proof from the field, from choosing a contractor to running the site.
The six products ↓ Product 02 · Process safetyLive barrier management, from HAZOP to bow-tie.
For operating plants. Your existing safety studies become a live picture of the barriers protecting your people, kept current as the plant changes. Up and running in days, not weeks.
Explore Barrier →Product 01 · the assurance platform
Each product answers one question well and can be bought alone. Find the question you cannot currently answer, and start there.
“Should this contractor be working for us at all?”
Choose contractors on proof, not on polished documents. The promises they make at tender become requirements we check later.
“Is the contractor actually ready to mobilise?”
Before a contractor starts, they prove they are ready, with evidence, not paperwork copied from a template.
“Are the critical controls standing today?”
A live list of the safety controls that matter on your site, checked from day one and kept current throughout.
“Are the plant's safety barriers intact?”
For running plants: proof that the safety barriers are in place and working, checked to the same standard as the construction site.
“Is every worker in the chain employed and treated lawfully?”
Know who actually employs every worker on your site, and that they are treated and paid lawfully, all the way down the chain.
“Are environmental commitments holding in the field?”
Environmental promises checked in the field, not taken on trust, with the same proof standard as everything else.
The architecture
One standard of proof. A check is a check, whether it is a safety barrier, a lifting control or a worker accommodation visit.
One way of scoring. Every product uses the same scale, so you can compare across projects without guesswork.
Set up for you, not rebuilt for you. Your branding, your requirements, your sites, without custom software to maintain.
Your data stays yours. The records, the evidence and the setup belong to you, and you can take them with you at any time.
The confidence model
Every finding carries one of four simple bands, so you always know how much weight to put on it. The system applies them automatically, so nobody can upgrade a number because a deadline is near.
Not checked yet, and shown as not checked, never hidden inside an average.
Based on documents alone, however complete they look. Paperwork can only ever reach this band; proof from the field goes further.
Checked in person, on site, with a place, a time and a name attached, on documents that are current.
Checked in person, but the document underneath is out of date, so the score is capped until it is refreshed.
Six commitments
They hold when your programme is under pressure, which is precisely when they matter.
We report what we found and how we found it, so assurance stays a live question rather than a framed certificate on the wall.
The people who check the work are never the people who did the work. That separation is written into the contract.
For a board pack, a lender or a deadline: if we sign it, we can show you the proof behind it.
Every score is set by the strength of the evidence behind it, applied automatically, so nobody can negotiate it upward.
Every number on a dashboard opens up to the proof behind it. What you see is what was actually checked.
Worker feedback is pooled before anyone sees it, so no individual can be identified. People speak freely, and that is what makes the data worth having.
Where this is built and held
The practitioners, the delivery and the intellectual property sit in Riyadh.
Your data is stored on named, auditable servers inside Saudi Arabia, under Saudi data law. It only leaves the Kingdom if you ask it to, in writing.
Field tools come in the languages your workforce actually speaks. Governance documents stay in the language of the contract.
The honest test
Start with the documents you already have, and see your true assurance position, plus a clear view of how to make it stronger.